Morgan Burtwistle, known online as Angryginge and winner of I’m A Celebrity… Get Me Out Of Here!, has become the latest target of online abuse after stepping in to challenge alleged racism during England’s World Cup draw with Ghana. The 24-year-old social media star was among the spectators at Boston Stadium on Tuesday when he confronted a man he accused of directing “incredibly racist comments” toward the Ghanaian national team. The incident has reignited debates over stadium security and the enforcement of anti-racism policies at major sporting events, particularly as FIFA’s “three-step protocol” comes under renewed scrutiny.
What happened inside the stadium
Burtwistle, who was seated in front of the man in question, told his followers that the individual made repeated racist remarks about Ghana’s players. In a YouTube video posted on Thursday, he described the man’s comments as “incredibly racist” and said he felt compelled to act. “The man sat in front was making incredibly racist comments towards the Ghanaian national team,” Burtwistle said. “Due to this, it was only right for me to stand up and deal with this.”
His attempts to have the man removed were frustrated by stewards, who initially told him they “can’t kick him out.” According to Burtwistle, the stewards cited a lack of immediate evidence as the reason for their inaction, despite his offer to provide video footage from his phone. “They said they needed to see it for themselves first,” he explained in the video. Burtwistle later confirmed that despite reporting the incident and providing evidence, the man remained in the stadium throughout the match. “I think it’s an absolute f***ing disgrace he’s been allowed to stay in and watch the game after having evidence on the vlog,” he said. “I’ve been over and reported it to the FIFA matchday security team, and five witnesses, literally all of us have heard him say it, and he’s still been able to watch the game.”
One steward later informed Burtwistle that the man would only be ejected if he made another racist comment—a policy he described as “ridiculous.” The steward’s explanation suggested that the stadium’s anti-racism protocol required a second offence before enforcement could be triggered, a claim that contradicts FIFA’s stated commitment to zero tolerance. The incident has drawn sharp criticism from fans and anti-racism campaigners, who argue that such thresholds for action are woefully inadequate and undermine the credibility of the tournament’s inclusivity claims.
Why this moment matters now
The abuse directed at Burtwistle in the aftermath of his intervention underscores the toxic environment that persists around football’s efforts to tackle discrimination. In screenshots shared on his Instagram story, he displayed a barrage of threatening and abusive messages, accompanied by the caption: “Standing up to racism gets you this? What a world we live in.” The backlash has amplified calls for stricter enforcement of anti-racism protocols at World Cup venues, where FIFA’s “three-step protocol” is supposed to ensure swift action against discriminatory behaviour.
Burtwistle’s experience also highlights the limitations of current safeguards. Despite multiple witnesses and recorded evidence, the man remained in the stadium, raising questions about the effectiveness of stewards’ training and the consistency of their responses. His claim that the man was seen leaving the venue after the game—only to be spotted again by spectators—further suggests that initial reporting failed to trigger the necessary consequences. The stewards’ reliance on a “second offence” threshold, as described by Burtwistle, appears to conflict with FIFA’s official guidelines, which mandate immediate action upon witnessing discriminatory behaviour.
For a tournament marketed as a celebration of inclusivity, incidents like this expose the gap between policy and practice. FIFA’s pre-match announcements urge fans to “kick racism out,” yet the reality on the ground often falls short. Burtwistle’s frustration is shared by many who have witnessed similar failures, from grassroots football to elite competitions. The incident has prompted renewed calls for independent observers to be stationed in stands to monitor discriminatory behaviour, rather than relying solely on stewards who may lack the necessary training or authority.
What comes next
Burtwistle has stated that he has reported the incident to tournament organisers, specifically naming the FIFA matchday security team as the body handling the complaint. His video and social media posts have sparked renewed scrutiny of World Cup security measures, with supporters demanding clearer accountability for stewards and faster intervention when racism is reported. The incident may also prompt FIFA to review its enforcement of the three-step protocol, which includes a warning, a match suspension, and a stadium closure in cases of persistent abuse.
For now, the focus remains on ensuring that those who speak out against racism are not punished for doing so. Burtwistle’s case serves as a reminder that allyship in football extends beyond symbolic gestures—it requires tangible support when incidents occur. As he put it: “The message before the games at football is kick it out, if you see it, say it.” Yet, as his experience shows, saying it is only the first step. Making sure it leads to action remains the far greater challenge. The tournament’s organisers must now demonstrate whether their commitment to inclusivity is matched by the actions of those entrusted with enforcing it.
Leave a Reply