Romelu Lukaku’s inclusion in Belgium’s starting XI for the World Cup Group G opener against Iran was the most scrutinised tactical call of the tournament so far. The striker, recovering from a persistent groin issue, started despite limited match fitness, a decision that underscored Roberto Martinez’s gamble on his talismanic striker’s availability over his current form.
Why Martinez rolled the dice on Lukaku
Belgium’s manager has long relied on Lukaku as the focal point of their attack, and Martinez’s faith in his fitness was evident in the starting lineup. The decision to name Lukaku in the XI ahead of potentially more rested alternatives signals a belief that his presence alone justifies the risk, even if his sharpness is compromised. Martinez’s approach reflects a broader pattern in modern tournament football, where star players are often prioritised for their psychological impact and experience, regardless of their physical readiness.
Lukaku’s inclusion also hints at Belgium’s tactical blueprint for Iran. The striker’s physicality and hold-up play are seen as key to breaking down Iran’s defensive structure, which Martinez likely anticipates will be compact and disciplined. By deploying Lukaku centrally, Belgium aim to force Iran’s centre-backs into uncomfortable positions, creating channels for their midfielders—particularly Kevin De Bruyne—to exploit with through balls or cut-back crosses.
Iran’s defensive setup: A test for Belgium’s attack
Iran’s defensive organisation, as previewed by the Guardian’s tactical analysis, presents Belgium with a stern challenge. The report highlights concerns over Belgium’s defensive vulnerabilities, particularly the lack of pace in their centre-back pairing, with Mechele and Ngoy lacking top-level experience. This could expose Belgium to counter-attacks, especially if Lukaku’s mobility is restricted by his fitness.
Iran’s striker Sardar Azmoun, though not named in the extracts, is expected to target the space behind Belgium’s centre-backs, a scenario that could force Martinez to adjust his defensive structure mid-game. Belgium’s full-backs, tasked with supporting their wingers, will need to balance their offensive duties with defensive cover—a delicate act that could be disrupted if Lukaku’s movement is limited.
The Lukaku paradox: Form vs. necessity
Belgium’s campaign hinges on Lukaku’s ability to overcome his fitness concerns, but his inclusion raises questions about the team’s over-reliance on a player who may not be at his best. Martinez’s decision to start him despite the lack of fitness suggests a belief that his mere presence can elevate the team’s performance, even if his contributions are below his usual standard.
The gamble carries risks. If Lukaku struggles to impose himself, Belgium’s attack could become predictable, relying too heavily on De Bruyne’s creativity to unlock defences. Iran’s defensive solidity, as noted in the pre-match analysis, could stifle Belgium’s rhythm, leaving Lukaku isolated and ineffective. Martinez’s faith in Lukaku’s experience may yet pay off, but the margin for error in Group G is slim.
Belgium’s World Cup hopes now rest on whether Lukaku’s gamble pays off. Martinez’s decision to prioritise fitness over form is a calculated risk, but one that could backfire if Iran’s defence neutralises his threat. The match will be a litmus test for Belgium’s tournament ambitions—and Lukaku’s ability to deliver when it matters most.