Liverpool’s refusal to sell Curtis Jones for less than £35m has left Inter Milan’s summer plans in disarray after the Serie A champions twice failed to meet the club’s valuation. The Reds rejected verbal offers of £21m and £21.7m within days, a stance that underscores their unwillingness to part with a player central to their midfield structure.
Inter’s frustration grows as Liverpool hold firm
Inter’s pursuit of Jones has been met with repeated frustration, with the latest £21.7m (€25m) bid dismissed as “considerably short” of Liverpool’s £35m valuation. The Reds’ stance suggests they view Jones as a long-term asset rather than a tradable commodity, a position reinforced by reports that they will only consider offers closer to their figure. Liverpool’s refusal to engage with Inter’s valuation leaves the midfielder’s future in limbo, with a potential free transfer next summer the only alternative if no acceptable bid materialises.
The frustration extends beyond the financials. Jones, 24, has been a consistent presence in Liverpool’s midfield this season, offering energy and progressive passing that aligns with Jürgen Klopp’s pressing system. His omission from pre-season tours in recent years has been more about tactical rotation than a lack of trust, and Inter’s interest risks unsettling a player who remains integral to Liverpool’s plans.
Why Liverpool’s valuation isn’t negotiable
Liverpool’s £35m valuation isn’t arbitrary. Jones has started 28 Premier League games this season, contributing to Liverpool’s push for Champions League football, and his contract—set to expire in 2027—gives the club leverage. Selling below valuation would set a dangerous precedent, particularly for a player who has outperformed his initial price tag as a youth prospect. The Reds’ approach mirrors their handling of Harvey Elliott, where patience paid dividends in securing a long-term deal.
Inter’s midfield ambitions are no secret. With Nicolo Barella entering the final years of his contract and Marcelo Brozović’s departure last summer, they’ve targeted Jones as a replacement for the box-to-box role. However, their inability to bridge the valuation gap suggests they may need to recalibrate, either by increasing their offer or targeting alternatives like Rafael Leão’s teammate at Sporting CP, João Neves, who fits a similar profile.
Tactical fit: Jones vs. Inter’s midfield puzzle
Jones’ profile aligns with Inter’s needs, but his style contrasts with the Serie A side’s current setup. While Barella excels in progressive carries and Brozović provided defensive cover, Jones offers a blend of pressing intensity and vertical passing—traits that could complement a midfield three. However, Inter’s preference for technical midfielders like Hakan Çalhanoğlu and Davide Frattesi may limit Jones’ role if he joins.
Liverpool’s reluctance to sell also reflects their broader squad-building strategy. With Alexis Mac Allister’s future uncertain and Ryan Gravenberch yet to fully establish himself, Jones provides stability. The Reds’ midfield depth has been a strength this season, and losing a player of his calibre without adequate replacement would weaken their title push. Their stance sends a clear message: they won’t be rushed into decisions that compromise their competitive edge.
Inter’s pursuit of Jones highlights the midfield market’s volatility this summer. Clubs are chasing versatile, press-resistant midfielders, and Jones fits the bill—but Liverpool’s valuation ensures he won’t leave without a fight. For the Reds, the message is simple: they value Jones at £35m, and until Inter meets that figure, their midfielder stays put. The Serie A side must now decide whether to increase their bid or pivot to Plan B, while Liverpool watch on, secure in the knowledge that their valuation isn’t up for debate.
Leave a Reply